Sourcegraph releases

This document describes how we release Sourcegraph.

Release policies

Release Schedule

As of March 2024, Sourcegraph releases features monthly (see RFC 864) The 2024 schedule is as follows (version numbers are subject to change):

VersionFeature Freeze DateCode Freeze DateRelease DateRelease Kind
5.3.0February 1, 2024February 9, 2024February 15, 2024Minor
5.3.1N/AN/AFebruary 21, 2024Patch
5.3.2N/AN/AMarch 20, 2024Patch
5.3.3N/AN/AApril 5, 2024Monthly
5.3.4N/AN/AApril 22, 2024Patch
5.3.5N/AN/AMay 6, 2024Monthly
5.3.6N/AN/AMay 20, 2024Patch
5.3.7N/AN/AJune 5, 2024Monthly
5.3.8N/AN/AJune 20, 2024Patch
5.3.9N/AN/AJuly 6, 2024Monthly
5.3.10N/AN/AJuly 22, 2024Patch

These releases may require manual migration steps.

Releases are the responsibility of the Release Team, and are performed by the team.

Feature releases may be in a minor version (3.0.0 -> 3.1.0), or a major version (3.0.0 -> 4.0.0). Releases are published with semantic versioning syntax, though Sourcegraph releases do not necessarily follow the versioning semantics.

Selecting Release Dates

The following are general guidelines for selecting release dates:

  • Day 5: Monthly release

  • Day 20: Patch release

We chose day 5 to avoid holidays and other events at the beginning of the month, such as new quarterly review meetings and discussions. However, on some occassions these days fall on Friday or the weekend, so we generall consider the following criteria in the event the schedule above fall on a Friday or the weekend:

  1. Pick the next working day that isn’t a Friday. This gives time for release prep.

A release refers to a minor or major version increase of Sourcegraph (e.g. 3.0.0 -> 3.1.0).

Patch releases

A patch release refers to a patch version increase of Sourcegraph (e.g. 3.0.0 -> 3.0.1).

Generally speaking patches will only include bug fixes for previously released features. In some occasions we may release improvements to address issues that may not technically a bug fix, and in some occasions we may backport features provided they are:

  1. Behind a feature flag
  2. Low risk and well tested (with flag on and flag off)

Patch Schedule

Patches are scheduled regularly throughout the month. They usually happen on the 20th of each month (but might be subject to change following the release schedule above).

These releases never require any manual migration steps.

We will also release patches out of band from the schedule above if there are urgent incidents to resolve, such as a security incident or other critical issue affecting the usage of Sourcegraph.

Requesting a patch

  1. Reach out to the @release-team on #discuss-release-ship.

Key concepts and components

This section documents the process used to create releases at Sourcegraph.

Release captain

The release captain is responsible for managing the release process and ensuring release is executed successfully. The release captain may delegate work to other teammates, but such delegation does not absolve the release captain of their responsibility to ensure that delegated work gets done.

The release captain should create a tracking issue using the release issue template at the beginning of the release cycle.

Release captain responsibilities are currently owned by the Release Team.

Release tooling

sg release is the tool used to create releases.

Release branches

Each major and minor release of Sourcegraph has a long lived release branch (e.g. 3.0, 3.1). Individual releases are tagged from these release branches (e.g. v3.0.0-rc.1, v3.0.0, v3.0.1-rc.1, and v3.0.1 would be tagged from the 3.0 release branch).

To avoid confusion between tags and branches:

  • Tags are always the full semantic version with a leading v (e.g. v2.10.0)
  • Branches are always the dot-separated major/minor versions with no leading v (e.g. 2.10).

Development always happens on main and changes are cherry-picked onto release branch as necessary with the approval of the release captain.


Here is an example git commit history:

  1. The release captain creates the 3.0 release branch at commit B.
  2. The release captain tags the release candidate v3.0.0-rc.1 at commit B.
  3. A feature is committed to main in commit C. It will not ship in 3.0.
  4. An issue is found in the release candidate and a fix is committed to main in commit D.
  5. The release captain cherry-picks D from main into 3.0.
  6. The release captain tags v3.0.0 on the 3.0 release branch.
  7. Development continues on main with commits E, F, G, H.
  8. Commit F fixes a critical bug that impacts 3.0, so it is cherry-picked onto the 3.0 release branch and v3.0.1 is tagged.
  9. The release captain (different person) for 3.1 creates the 3.1 release branch at commit H and a new release cycle begins.
  10. Commit J fixes a critical bug that impacts both 3.0 and 3.1, so it is cherry-picked into both 3.0 and 3.1 release branches and new releases are tagged (v3.0.2, v3.1.2).
A---B---C---D---E---F---G---H---I---J---K---L (main branch)
     \                       \
      \                       `---v3.1.0-rc.1---I'---v3.1.0---J'---v3.1.2 (3.1 release branch)
        `---v3.0.0-rc.1---D'---v3.0.0---F'---v3.0.1---J'---v3.0.2 (3.0 release branch)


This section documents how do we deal with issues that are found during the release process.


The release always ships on time, even if it’s missing features or bug fixes we hoped to get in (why?).

There are only three kinds of issues that are eligible to block a release:

  1. Issues that literally prevent us from tagging a release (i.e. our CI logic to produce builds from git tags is broken).
  2. Issues that fundamentally break our product for a majority of our customers and don’t have acceptable workarounds.
  3. Critical security regressions from the previous release.

Only the release captain can label something as release blocking.

The release captain has unlimited power to make changes to the release branch to resolve release blocking issues. As soon as a release blocking issue is identified, the release captain should decide the least risky way to resolve the issue as soon as possible. A good default action is to identify and revert offending commits from the release branch. In the worst case, this could involve recreating the release branch from an earlier commit on main. Project owners can work on main to fix the issue, and if the issue is resolved in time, revert the revert and cherry-pick the fix on the release branch.


Most issues are non-blocking. Fixes to non-blocking issues can be fixed in main by the code owner who can then git cherry-pick those commits into the release branch with the approval of the release captain. Alternatively, broken features can be reverted out of the release branch or disabled via feature flags if they aren’t ready or are too buggy.

When releasing a new version, the Release Captain may need to manually update the Follow the instruction below:

  • Check past entries in to understand the changelog format.
  • Create a new H2 title named {major}.{minor}.{patch} (the new version) after the Unreleased section if it doesn’t already exist.
  • Copy all changelog entries of the commits belong to this patch release into the new H2 title ## {major}.{minor}.{patch}, grouped into the types they were originally in (e.g. ### Added, ### Changed, ### Fixed, ### Removed).

Support for older versions

At Sourcegraph, we’re committed to providing the best support possible for our users. As such, we offer support for the latest version (N) and its previous major version (N-1). For instance, if version 5.x is the most recent release, we provide support for both 5.x and 4.x. However, once we release a new major version (e.g., 6.x), we will discontinue support for 4.x.

Please note that if you encounter any issues that can be resolved with an upgrade or are caused by using an outdated version, we will be unable to provide support. We recommend keeping up-to-date with the latest features and improvements to ensure the best experience.

Cody clients and backwards compatibility

Cody client extensions, such as the VS Code extension, need to maintain backwards compatibility with Sourcegraph servers back to 5.0.0. The Sourcegraph server has no backward compatibility requirements with respect to the clients. However, the server should try to maintain backwards compatibility with clients on a best effort basis.

Why only back to 5.0 instead of our standard policy of latest version and previous major version? That will eventually be our policy. However, since Cody was new to 5.0.0, it’s a necessary exception to that policy.